|
| |
Obama Birth Certificate Issue More Urgent Than
Ever
By Joan
Swirsky
Now that the
regime currently occupying the White House has bribed, threatened,
intimidated, bullied, manipulated and cut unconstitutional and illegal deals
exclusively with Democrats to vote for the totalitarian nightmare of
socialized medicine, the subject of Obama’s missing birth certificate is
more timely and relevant than ever – precisely because the ugly spectacle
emphasized once again the degree to which Obama has arrogantly flouted,
sneered at, and spit upon the U.S. Constitution, a document he and his
handlers and henchmen clearly revile and are determined to shred and
destroy.
The same contempt for the bedrock
foundations of our country was apparent during Obama’s run for the
presidency and his refusal to produce his birth certificate. It reminds me
of the search I conducted in 2004 for
my mother's birth certificate,
a non-negotiable prerequisite for her admission into a nursing home.
Although she was born in a farmhouse in 1913 to immigrants who didn’t speak
English, it took me only three phone calls and not more than 20 minutes to
locate this valuable document. Unlike Obama, who was born, he says, in 1961,
I didn’t pay nearly two-million dollars to lawyers to fight the nursing
home’s request.
To this day
Obama has failed to produce proof that he was born in the United States and
that he is a natural-born American citizen, one of only three absolute
requirements in the U.S. Constitution to become President of the United
States. In fact, if Obama is not a natural-born American citizen, he is
acting as president under false pretenses, which de facto makes every
statement he has made as the usurper POTUS, every bill he has signed, every
tsar he has appointed, every act, proclamation, signing statement, executive
order, and law, et al, fraudulent, illegal, and therefore null and void –
including this unconstitutional healthcare so-called reform bill.
As I type, Mr.
Hope & Change is working on granting citizenship to millions of illegal
immigrants to further bankrupt the United States and thereby etch in stone a
constituency that relies on free everything – and will therefore return the
favor by voting Democratic in future elections. This will actualize his and
the far-left’s goals of turning our democratic Republic into a Communist
share-the-poverty facsimile of a Russian, Cuban or Venezuelan state!
But that is not
all: Obama is putting on the fast track the cap-and-trade scheme to tax
every person in the U.S. every time he or she flushes the toilet, turns on a
light, opens the refrigerator, drives a car, the list of penalties for
merely living go on and on.
When this or
that writer or commentator asks, “Doesn’t he realize that X. Y. Z?” – the
answer is, of course he does! His entire raison d’être is to convert the
country he hates – America – into the kind of socialist/communist/fascist
country he clearly admires. Exhibit no. 1 is surely his serial embrace of
foreign dictators and his undisguised hostility to our most trusted allies.
How did this happen? As blogger
Daniel Greenfield notes, Obama’s election “was not about what the people
wanted. It was about his own victory by any means necessary. Hardly
surprising from the man who began his political career by betraying and
destroying his own mentor, climbed into the United States Senate over two
sex scandals that were a product of his opposition research, and reached the
White House through voter fraud, illegal campaign donations and an owned
media corps….Each win for Obama was another loss for fair and honest
elections. And each time Obama won, it was not because the public decided he
was the better man, but because the sheer array of dirty tricks, fraud and
media propaganda insured that no choices would be allowed.”
Today, there are few Americans,
even Obama’s acolytes and fans, who now think he is a natural-born American
or, for that matter, a Christian, as he pretended to be as a congregant for
20 years in his Chicago pastor’s Black Theology church. In short, black
theology is Marxist doctrine: hate America, hate whitey, hate Jews, hate
free-market capitalism, hate the U.S. Constitution. Here,
he just about admits as much.
From where I stand, that
pretty well sums up Obama’s first 14 months in office.
THE USURPER-IN-CHIEF
At this point,
every member of the Congress and media, as well as ordinary citizens, knows
that there was something putridly rotten about Obama’s election. Not just
the billion dollars in campaign donations, most of which are still
unaccounted for but known to have flowed from foreign donors, many of them
enemies of America. And not just the missing mountains of qualifying data
that all presidential candidates are expected to produce, including:
·
His Illinois law license. Is he
even a lawyer? Where is his supposed Harvard Law degree? Where are the
papers he wrote in law school? Why does he not correct people when they say
he was a law professor when he was never a professor but only a lecturer?
·
His Selective Service
registration, which investigative-journalist and lawyer Debbie Schlussel has
reported to be
falsified,
an accusation that Linda Bentley quite persuasively
documented
just the other day.
·
His visa or more probably visas.
After all, he did travel to Pakistan in 1981 when Americans were forbidden
into that country. Did he use the Indonesian visa he got when he was a
citizen of that country?
·
His school records from Indonesia
and Hawaii.
·
His college transcripts from
Occidental College in CA, Columbia College in NY, and Harvard Law School in
MA
·
His Baptism certificate.
·
His Illinois State Senate
records.
·
His law practice client list.
·
His University of Chicago
records, where Obama, the instructor, supposedly taught.
Just as mysterious is the
question of who exactly backed this virtually unknown neophyte senator with
the paper-thin résumé and almost non-existent voting record, this man who
had lifelong associations with countless dubious-if-not-criminal friends and
associates as well as political radicals.
We now know
the leftist billionaire financier George Soros was and is a major backer.
And we’ve also learned that dozens of Clinton administration leftovers and
elected officials, all of the hard left, as well as a number of hugely
influential executives and bankers from AIG and Goldman Sachs were part of
Obama’s toxic brew. But how, you may ask, could these arch capitalists be
leftists? Like Soros, they fancy themselves Kings of the Universe, smarter
than the average Joe and therefore destined to join a new American oligarchy
in which the few rule and the many are under their collective thumbs.
The motives of
these megalomaniacs involve the tenacious belief – facts to the contrary –
that the proven tyrannies of socialism and communism will improve the lot of
the masses they consider so stupid, combined with a driving lust for
absolute power – you know, the kind that corrupts absolutely. Underlying
both is a worldview in which most people are perceived to be “victims” of
“the system.” And of course a fulminating rage.
Again, Greenfield
weighs in,
explaining that that rage is part of “the bargain leftists always strike:
I Will Only Love You,
If You Kill Yourself.
Leftists
only love an America, he says, “in
which the Constitution is wielded to protect Islamic terrorists and a man
who hates the country can take office in the White House, in which the lives
of Americans are worthless but the comfortable treatment of captured
terrorists is worth more than gold, in which all of the country's history
and values are viewed as nothing more than the brutal atrocities of greedy
savages, while the brutal atrocities of newly arrived greedy savages are
treated as heroic achievements worthy of celebration and praise...”
“In their more
honest moments,” Greenfield continues, “leftists will admit that they do not
love America, only its potential…to be changed by them…moments like Michelle
Obama proclaiming that she had never been proud of her country before…a
chilling glimpse into the mind of the left that cannot love anything that is
not an expression of their own ego…”
“They love
[an] America that legalizes illegal aliens, displaces its own citizens to
make way for them and tears down all barriers against crime and terror. They
love America, so long as it frees terrorists from prison, and when war is
declared against it by a fanatical cult of mass murderers, it gives the
murderers their day in court with lawyers and a trial…This is the America
they love. I will only love you, if you kill yourself.”
A CABAL OF IMMENSE PROPORTIONS
A coup
d’état
is never an overnight phenomenon. It takes years, often decades, of
planning, and more often than not there are thwarted attempts along the way.
In America, leftists have been actively trying both to undermine and
overthrow our country since at least the 1960s (actually well before then,
unquestionably for the last hundred years). They tried with Jimmy Carter,
but in spite of the lasting harm he did, his stupendous incompetence
ultimately did him in, relegating him to one ignominious term.
They tried
again with Bill Clinton, who spent years – when he might have been fighting
for our country in Vietnam – hanging around England smoking pot and, oddly,
“visiting” Communist Russia. Clinton lasted two terms, largely because he
was too narcissistic and undisciplined to stick to the leftist party line,
craving the spotlight to such a degree that when the electorate smacked him
and his wife down for trying to inflict socialized medicine on our citizens,
he moved ever so nimbly to the center, where he stayed until he practically
had to be dragged off the stage during the most self-aggrandizing departure
of a president in American history.
Through
these failures, the left learned never to depend on a genuine
natural-born American citizen to actualize their coup, that the real thing
would somehow retain some random DNA strands of affection for our republic.
They would have to find a faux American, one that looked and sounded like
the real thing, but whose allegiance to America was non-existent – perhaps
someone who had lived in a Muslim country, studied the Koran, subscribed to
Sharia law, and had lifelong relationships with Marxists and Communists and
other America haters. Enter the man who calls himself Barack Obama.
·
How could Obama’s “mother,”
Stanley Ann Dunham, have delivered him in August of 1961 in Honolulu when
official University of Washington records show her 2680 miles away in
Seattle attending classes that same month? (Pamela Geller:
www.atlasshrugs.com).
·
Was he
really the son of his earliest mentor, Frank Marshall Davis,
a prominent poet, Communist
political activist, and self-professed pedophile? Davis wrote about raping a
13-year-old girl. Could that girl have been Stanley Ann Dunham? Could this
be why Obama wrote on his Facebook page that he was born in 1957?
·
Was Obama really the only son of
Malcolm X and his wife Betty Shabazz? They had six daughters but did they
leave the care of their only son to surrogates to protect him from the same
fate – assassination – that killed Malcolm X?
·
Or did Malcolm X father Obama
with one of the dozens of daughters of the Communist Indonesian President
Sukarno, after the older man invited him to the anti-white, anti-capitalist
Bandung conference in 1955? Sukarno loathed America. Was it he who hatched
the plot to take over America? Did he then share his idea with Malcolm X
because he believed the American Muslim was capable of succeeding?
·
Where do the Rockefellers fit in?
Recent speculation has it that Michael Rockefeller, the Harvard graduate who
is thought to have died in Papua, New Guinea, may have fathered Obama with a
Papuan woman.
Here's a film of Michael's strange odyssey.
Is it coincidence that Obama’s “grandfather” Stanley and his stepfather Lolo
Soetoro both worked for the Rockefellers’ Standard Oil Company?
·
Is it coincidence that the
Marxist-praising Zbigniew Brzezinski, a Rockefeller crony and Jimmy Carter’s
National Security Advisor, now acts as an advisor to Obama?
·
What are we to make of Obama’s
old friend from high school, Illinois Army National Guard Major L. Tammy
Duckworth, telling (The
Honolulu Advisor
on January 8, 2006), that she was “happy to point out that she and
Hawaii-raised Punahou (Indonesia) high school graduate Obama have “a
karma’aina connection”? Both of them, she said, were born outside the
country – Obama in Indonesia, Duckworth in Thailand. Predictably, Duckworth
retracted
her statement a few days after the article appeared in print.
·
Was it just a fashion statement
when we witnessed Michelle Obama on election night appear in a dress of the
revolutionary and anarchic colors of red and black, with a gigantic sash in
the unmistakable configuration of an X – and Obama’s very young daughters
also dressed in revolutionary red and black? As an observer
wrote,
“What
if the garb worn by the Obama’s was a silent tribute to Barack’s real
father, Malcolm X?…the red and black dress and that X that hits you between
the eyes…where are the various shades of red, white, and blue?...”
·
Was the CIA behind
Obama’s attempted coup
d’état?
Where does the Ford Foundation fit in?
If you want a much more extensive
history of the Ford Foundation, the CIA and the ghastly Indonesian coup,
read David Ransom’s piece
here.
·
What is the likelihood of Obama’s
so-called mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, meeting two “husbands” – Barack Obama
Sr. and Lolo Soetoro, both connected to “Big Oil” – at the University of
Hawaii?
·
Obama denies he’s a Muslim but
“the accumulated research from primary sources who knew Obama from his
childhood indicate that he was a devout Muslim, the son of a devout Muslim,
the stepson of a devout Muslim and the grandson and namesake (“Hussein”) of
a devout Muslim. He was registered in school in Indonesia as a Muslim and
demonstrated his ability to chant praise to Allah in impressive
Arab-accented tones even as an adult. Just as he has not disavowed his
`uncle’ Jeremiah, neither has he disavowed the Muslim faith that he was born
into and raised in. Here, with George Stephanopoulos,
Obama says as much.
·
Is Obama the son of spooks and a
spook himself?
In a
can't-put-down article,
Deanna Spingola writes of Pastor James David
Manning, who in May is holding a public trial at Columbia University in New
York (just blocks from Manning’s church in Harlem) that is charging Barack
Obama with treason! Here is what Spingola writes:
“Obama…was
recruited [at Occidental College in CA] in 1980 by the CIA [when Stansfield
M. Turner was the director]
which has made it a
practice since its inception to recruit college students. He was, by his own
admission, a `C’ student, a dope smoker and a member of the Marxist Club at
Occidental, a co-educational liberal arts college. In 1981, Obama allegedly
transferred from Occidental to Columbia University…Columbia had a foreign
student program and the CIA has major connections and influence with
Columbia and the nation’s other educational facilities…the CIA needed
Muslims or others who could easily blend into the Muslim environment in the
Middle East…Obama, as an undercover agent, was the lead agent in the arms
and money supply for the CIA-trained Taliban Army against the Soviet Army
war machine. His actions were integral to the Taliban’s success in their
opposition to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. Obama, it is publicly
acknowledged, went to Pakistan in 1981. There is no way of knowing how often
Obama traveled between Pakistan and Russia.
“According to Dr. Manning,” Spingola writes, “Obama was an interpreter for
the CIA during the war in Afghanistan. When
Obama completed his CIA operations in the mid 1980s and returned to the U.S.
he persuaded the State Department to maneuver his entrance into Harvard Law
School…”
Needless to
say, Pastor Manning’s life has been threatened and continues to be
threatened by people who are deeply afraid of his explosive charges.
And here is yet another bizarre
oddity: an
article
saying that Barack Obama, former editor of the Harvard Law Review,
“voluntarily surrendered” his law license back in 2008 in order to escape
charges that he lied on his bar application, and that First Lady Michelle
Obama "voluntarily surrendered" her law license in 1993!
MASSIVE MEDIA MALFEASANCE
I have written at length of the
many lawyers and journalists who have addressed the birth certificate issue.
You can read some of their names here.
But with the notable and noteworthy exceptions I’ve mentioned, other
so-called investigative journalists who should have been asking and
answering the above questions and dozens of others are an extinct species,
killed off by leftist media moguls in league with the Obama regime or too
timid and pandering in their own rights to have taken up the cudgels on
behalf of the public they pretend to serve.
People
understand why hacks from the former, now moribund, mainstream media have
avoided the subject of Obama’s eligibility like the plague it is. By and
large they are liberals and leftists who shilled for him during his
campaign, concealed mountains of damning evidence about his lack of
experience and shady associations, and studiously avoided any mention of his
still-unknown country of birth.
But harder to understand are the
hacks at Fox. In a startling display of dishonesty and pretension, Bill
O’Reilly, who wants to be considered intelligent and so never fails to tell
his audience that he earned a master’s degree at Harvard, apparently never
studied coups d’états, never realized that the Marxist Castro’s shining
moment came only after years of agitation, rebellion, subterfuge, et al. But
the idea of Obama being part of a conspiracy was apparently too much for the
former elementary school teacher to contemplate… above his pay grade, so to
speak. Never even consulted Wikipedia, as I just did, to learn of
the hundreds of coups d’état
that took place in the 20th
century alone.
Apparently Harvard never taught Mr. “looking out for the folks” about the
successful coups in Argentina in 1943, in Thailand in 1947, in
Czechoslovakia
in 1948, in Egypt in 1952, in Paraguay in 1954, in Pakistan in1958, in
Venezuela in 1958, in Turkey in 1960, in Ecuador and
Syria and Brazil and South Vietnam and Ghana and Libya and Somalia and
Greece and Chile and again in Pakistan, the list is endless – and the
immense and lengthy planning that went into these government overthrows. Or
the more recent coups – since 1999 – in the Ivory Coast, Fiji, Peru,
Mauritania, Haiti, Congo, et al.
Without
acknowledging the widespread existence of coups and the years or decades of
planning they entailed, O’Reilly decided to slam “the birthers” – as he
pejoratively calls those who still believe in the Constitution and think
presidents of the U.S. should abide by it, starting with their eligibility –
and stated that he personally had seen Obama’s birth certificate.
Of course he
hadn’t. He lied. Then in an orchestrated charade, he trotted out two of the
women, both lawyers, he routinely disrespects by barking out their last
names and in essence had them standing on their hind legs, yapping in
agreement about those misguided “birthers.” It didn’t take long for Glenn
Beck to echo their yaps. That’s right, the guy who routinely looks straight
in the camera and exhorts his audience to seek “the truth.”
Why would O’Reilly lie? Why would Beck avoid seeking
“the truth” in this one glaring instance? Were they threatened, as Douglas
Hagmann – a respected journalist, director of the
Northeast Intelligence Network
and longtime private investigator, and Judi McLeod, a prolific journalist
and the managing editor of
Canada Free Press
– suggested? After a nine-month investigation, they discovered that
prominent media people had indeed been threatened by the heads of major TV
and radio stations and also Federal Communication Commission officials –
with job losses and worse – to never raise, allude to or
mention the birth certificate issue! Or was it the huge influence the Saudis
have over Fox content since they bought and then increased their shares to
nearly 20 percent in Rupert Murdoch’s NewsCorp?
Whatever. The
fact that O’Reilly and Beck caved – and continue to cave – has forever
negated their credibility.
WHAT NOW?
So appalled are a majority of
Americans at the hijacking of one-sixth of the American economy through the
healthcare legislation, and so revolted by the hideous process it entailed,
that upwards of 15 state attorneys general – and counting – are suing the
federal government on grounds that key parts of the Deathcare law are
unconstitutional – that the law includes taxpayer-funded abortions
(smoke-and-mirrors to the contrary), kill-the-elderly cuts to Medicare
seniors, huge tax increases that will wipe out the entire middle-class of
our country, and a Nazi-like brown-shirt $16-billion-taxpayer-funded force
of Internal Revenue Service goons to reinforce our descent into tyranny.
Ordinary citizens are suing too, among them four residents of Michigan,
represented by the Thomas
More Law Center and attorney David Yerushalmi.
And
dozens if not hundreds of groups are crying Repeal, which former speaker
Newt Gingrich explained was not possible because Obama would veto such a
move. What is possible, Gingrich said, is for Republicans to gain majorities
in the House and Senate during the midterms in November and then cut off
funding for this horrific, bankrupt-the-nation law. And if the GOP gains the
presidency in 2012, they can then repeal this socialist
blueprint.
But there may
lie the rub. As writer J.D. Longstreet reminds us: “The democrats’ lust for
power is so great and their zeal for socialism so intense that I cannot see
them allowing their hold on power to be placed in jeopardy by, of all
things, an election where the voice of the people is actually heard…in less
than eighteen months the Obama Regime has managed to take America from a
constitutional republic to a socialist republic…that accomplishment alone
should give you reason enough to suspect that when their power is threatened
they will use the full force of the Central Government to ruthlessly crush
any and all who they perceive as a threat. At this moment in history, a
threat is anyone, any American, who does not agree with them.”
Longstreet and others imagine Obama creating a national
crisis or emergency – sort of like the phony swine flu “pandemic” last year
– in which Martial Law is declared and the midterm elections are suspended.
“Who decides what a national emergency is?” he asks. “You’ve got it – the
Obama Regime!”
Longstreet
then issues a warning: “The American people are a patient people. We will
put up with a lot of nonsense from our government – for a while. But we draw
the line when that government ignores the Constitution, as the Obama Regime
and the Democrats in the Congress have done. There is a seething rage in
America today…my senses tell me it is too late to avoid the `lashing out’
Americans are about to unleash. [Americans] are waiting, just waiting, for
an incident that will knock the chocks from the dam wall holding back the
cascade. Postponing, or suspending, the midterm election…would be the spark
that ignites a firestorm that will consume all in its path.”
Journalist Sher Zieve
concurs.
“The political party that promoted the slavery of Africans, established Jim
Crow laws, created the Ku Klux Klan, refused to follow court orders barring
segregation…is now is full raging power within the borders of the United
States of America. Most of them—including their dictatorial leader Barack
Hussein Obama—realize that the chances for their reelections to power are,
at best, marginal. I have warned that any and all `free’ elections would
probably soon be a thing of the past. The Marxist way is to not allow them,
in the first place.
“The
current US government is moving quickly and forcefully against the American
people,” Zieve continues. “I have to now wonder how close We-the-People are
today toward reaching the same conclusions as did our founders…I think we
may be as close to our founders ultimate decision as we will ever be. Do we
wish to be free and sovereign or submit to bondage? For a brief window of
time longer, it’s still our choice.”
Then there is Michael Connelly’s
stern warning:
“…I have some bad news for all of the socialists, or progressives, or
whatever you choose to call yourselves this week, you have made a huge
mistake. Following the attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, Japanese
Admiral Yamamoto who led the attack said that: `I fear all we have done is
to awaken a sleeping giant and fill him with a terrible resolve.’
“I suggest
to President Obama, Nancy Pelosi, and Harry Reid that you have awakened the
giant again and that this giant, made up of freedom loving Americans, is
going to be coming at you from every direction you can imagine. Individuals
and State Governments will be challenging you in the courts, and Americans
will take you on in the polling places. In every city, town and village you
will hear the voices of angry Americans and despite your best efforts we
will not be silenced. You will hear the outcry of Americans of every race,
religion, and creed and we will prevail. “
All of this
takes time, of course…. time well spent. But it will take less time to
revive the serious question of Obama’s very suspect eligibility to be
president in the first place!
“Forget
the dispute over the `natural born citizen’ requirement of the U.S.
Constitution for presidents,”
writes
Bob Unruh of WorldNetDaily. “Barack Obama may
not even be a `citizen,’ according to a new filing in a long-running legal
challenge to his eligibility to occupy the Oval Office.”
If there is even one court in our land whose judge has
not been threatened, intimidated, bought off or bribed, the case for Obama’s
ineligibility should be tried immediately. If found guilty,
I suspect Obama would be responsible for the greatest purchase of confetti
in the history of the world!